Publishing

Medium Website Analysis

medium.com

AI-powered website review · Last analyzed March 27, 2026

Overall Grade

C
68/100

Medium loads like it's buffering a 1080p video on dialup while simultaneously arguing with its own JavaScript.

About Medium's Website

Medium (medium.com) is a publishing website. Our AI analyzed its design, copywriting, SEO optimization, performance metrics, and user experience to generate this comprehensive website score.

With an overall score of 68/100 and a grade of C, here's what our AI found:

Detailed Breakdown

🖱️

Medium UX Score

72

Navigation is clear, but the experience feels like walking through mud.

Your accessibility score of 89 is respectable—no missing alt text, viewport settings are mostly there. The layout is logical and your 10 internal links help navigation. However, that 200ms First Input Delay means every button click feels sluggish, and the 6.8s LCP torpedoes perceived performance before users even interact. Add better visual feedback on interactions, implement skeleton screens to reduce perceived load time, and for god's sake, eliminate that `[user-scalable="no"]` restriction (accessibility fail) and the maximum-scale limitation. Make the page FEEL fast even if you can't make it actually fast overnight.

🔍

Medium SEO Score

85

Your SEO basics are locked and loaded—too bad your robot overlords are confused.

You're pulling a 92 on SEO Insights, which is solid. Your OG tags are properly filled, viewport is set, and favicon is present. BUT: your robots.txt is broken (0/100), there's no main landmark in the HTML (accessibility nightmare for screen readers), and your Time to Interactive is 20/100. Google might understand your content, but it's crawling through a minefield to do it. Fix that robots.txt immediately and add proper semantic HTML—a <main> element costs zero dollars and fixes your landmark issue.

✍️

Medium Copy Score

58

49 words of homepage copy is like showing up to a gunfight with a spoon.

Your meta description is pleasant but your actual page has almost zero headline hierarchy—no H1, no H2, just a lonely H3 that says 'A place to read, write, and deepen your understanding.' That's nice poetry, but where's the conversion hook? Why should someone STAY instead of bouncing? Your CTAs exist but they're whispers in a library. Add substantive H1/H2 structure, nail down your value proposition in the first 20 words, and give people a reason to click beyond 'read stuff.'

🎨

Medium Design Score

72

Your UI is clean but your performance budget got left in 2015.

The visual design itself is inoffensive—minimal, readable, on-brand. But here's the thing: a 6.8s LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) means users are staring at a blank screen for longer than it takes to make a cup of coffee. Your hero image loads like it's traveling via carrier pigeon. Strip down that bloated JavaScript execution time (you're at 0/100 on that audit) and consider lazy-loading non-critical assets. Right now you're designing in a vacuum while your infrastructure gasps for air.

Medium Performance Score

42

Your page moves like it's streaming consciousness in real-time.

65 on PageSpeed Insights is embarrassing for a company built on reading/writing. LCP at 6.8s? FID at 200ms? You're shipping 6 external scripts, missing source maps for large JavaScript, and have massive unused JavaScript rotting on the page. Your Time to Interactive sits at a pathetic 20/100. Start immediately: code-split that JavaScript, minify ruthlessly, defer non-critical scripts, and implement a proper monitoring system. You're literally slowing down the experience of reading—which is your core product. That's like a restaurant making customers wait 7 seconds before the menu appears.

How does your website compare?

Get a free AI-powered analysis of your own website in seconds.

Roast My Website

Share this analysis

Website needs code cleanup too?

Try CodeNeat — Free Developer Tools →

More Website Analyses